3.0
|
SOUTHCO'S PROPOSAL
|
3.1
|
The Southern Electricity Supply Company of Orissa Ltd.
(SOUTHCO) is carrying out the business of distribution and retail supply of electricity in
eight Districts of State of Orissa namely Ganjam, Gajapati, Kandhamala, Boudh, Rayagada,
Koraput, Nawarangpur and Malkanagiri. The company receives bulk supply from GRIDCO at
several interconnected points at HT and EHT.
|
3.2
|
The profile of the company as on 31 March 2001 gives a pen
picture about its current activities.
Total consumer
|
-
|
3,81,970
|
Total input in MU
|
-
|
1552.70
|
Total billing in MU
|
-
|
875.431
|
Total billing in rupees lakhs
|
-
|
22829.65 (Source:F-17 of RR 02-03)
|
33 KV lines (in Kms.)
|
-
|
2747.66
|
11KV lines (in Kms.)
|
-
|
11717.715 Source:
|
LT lines (in Kms.)
|
-
|
9351.193 SOUTHCO
|
33/11KV sub-stations
|
-
|
183 nos., 381.54 MVA General data
|
11/0.4 KV sub-stations
|
-
|
8122 nos., 479.29 MVA dt.28.8.01
|
|
3.3
|
The comparative figure of consumption at different voltage
levels as well as energy purchase in MU from the FY 1998-99 onwards with a projection for
the future periods is taken from various filings with the Commission and tabulated to
serve as an indicator about pattern of consumption in the area of licensee. Table-1
Energy Sale & Purchase
Segment
|
FY 99 Billing MU
|
FY 00 Billing MU
|
FY 01 Billing MU
|
FY 02 Expected Billing MU
|
FY 03 Expected Billing MU
|
LT category
|
520 |
519 |
553.221 |
598.342 |
631.666 |
HT category
|
208 |
185 |
192.747 |
195.358 |
206.865 |
EHT category
|
120 |
129 |
129.463 |
122.265 |
132.679 |
Total Sales
|
848 |
833 |
875.431 |
915.965 |
971.21 |
Energy purchase
|
1494 |
1433 |
1522.703 |
1541.25 |
1584.5 |
|
3.4
|
Sale Mix Analysis
|
3.4.1
|
The voltage wise sale mix of consumers in percentage is given
in the table to indicate that the consumption is getting skewed in favour of LT which has
been taken from table-II of the RST application of 2000-01 for the FYs 1998-99 and 1999-00
and the same data in respect of FY 2000-01, 2001-02 and 2002-03 has been taken from
technical format T-1 of RR application 2002-03. Table-2
Sale mix variation
Segment
|
SOUTHCO
FY 99 |
SOUTHCO
FY 00
|
SOUTHCO
FY 01 |
SOUTHCO
FY 02 |
SOUTHCO
FY 03
|
|
% of Total |
% of Total |
% of Total |
% of Total |
% of Total |
LT category
|
61.32% |
62.30% |
63.19% |
65.32% |
65.04% |
HT category
|
24.53% |
22.21% |
22.02% |
21.33% |
21.30% |
EHT category
|
14.15% |
15.49% |
14.79% |
13.35% |
13.66% |
Total
|
100.0% |
100.0% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
FY 2001-02 |
3.5
|
The licensee in its RST application of FY 01-02 has stated
that there exists a very high degree of non-technical loss in its LT distribution system.
|
3.6
|
It expects a growth rate of 12% in the domestic category for
the year 2001-02 based on the estimated increase in number of consumers for the first
quarter of the financial year.
|
3.7
|
It also estimates a growth of 9% in respect of commercial
consumption and 8% in respect of irrigation consumer due to aggressive metering programme.
|
3.8
|
In respect of HT consumers it estimates a growth rate of 8%
based on the consumption trend and increase in number of industries at the end of the
first quarter of the financial year 2001-2002.
|
3.9
|
The estimated growth rate is 12% in respect of EHT consumers
based on the consumption trend of the first quarter of the financial year 2001-2002. FY
2002-03 |
3.10
|
For determination of the consumption for the FY 2002-03.
|
3.11
|
SOUTHCO estimates a growth rate of 6% in domestic category, 3%
for commercial category and 5% for irrigation category over the previous year. This is
based on the metering programme and trend of consumption for the year 2001-02.
|
3.12
|
Similarly it expects a growth rate of 6% in HT category based
on the pattern of consumption available upto 2001-02 and expected drawal by large
industrial consumers.
|
3.13
|
REVENUE REQUIREMENT
|
3.13.1
|
The licensee is required to meet the cost of power purchase
from GRIDCO, the cost of distribution, covering expenses on account of employees,
administration and general expenses, repair and maintenance expenses, depreciation,
interest on loan, appropriation to contingency reserve and provision for bad and doubtful
debts. In addition to this, the licensee is expected to earn a reasonable return on its
capital base based on the methodology prescribed in the Sixth Schedule to the Supply Act,
1948. The cost of power purchase covers not only the cost of power required to meet the
need of the end users but also it covers the cost of energy lost on account of technical
and commercial losses of the distribution system. The licensee is also required to meet
the cost of capital of new investments needed to improve system reliability and quality of
power supply.
|
3.13.2
|
The licensee earns its only source of revenue through retail
supply tariff from the consumers of electricity within its area of license. A summary of
proposals of its revenue requirement and the expected revenue at the present tariff for
the year 2001-02 as taken from the filings before the Commission is given in the table
below. Table : 3
(Rs. in Crore)
Power Purchase Cost |
206.31 |
Distribution cost |
160.11 |
Contribution to contingency reserve |
1.10 |
Total revenue requirement |
367.53 |
(-) Misc. Receipts |
2.55 |
Reasonable return |
|
Net revenue requirement |
364.98 |
Net revenue receipt from sale of power |
253.93 |
Deficit |
(-)111.05 |
|
3.13.3
|
SOUTHCO in its application of 2001-02 has stated that during
their operation for the last two and half years the tariff order made by OERC on 30
December 1999 and 19 January 2001 were found to be notional as certain concessions allowed
to industrial consumers by the Commission had completely nullified the effect of RST
revision. Similarly, the increase granted in the RST order of 19.01.2001 was found to be
inadequate to meet the actual and anticipated expenses of the licensee and the Commission
disallowed certain legitimate and reasonable expenses and under-estimated the power
purchase expenses. On account of these factors, SOUTHCO continued to incur losses from 1st
April 1999 which trend continues for the year 2000-01 and 2001-02.
|
3.13.4
|
SOUTHCO has stated that in spite of RST increase announced by
OERC, the margin available to SOUTHCO even with 100% collection efficiency is grossly
inadequate to meet the operational expenses. As a result of this, there is substantial
increase in financial loss to SOUTHCO.
|
3.14
|
Distribution loss SOUTHCO in its
application has stated that it has set a target to reduce losses in the LT sector to
achieve an overall estimated loss of 38% in the FY 2001-02. The pilot study as directed by
the Commission has been taken up. The interim results of pilot study indicate that overall
distribution loss in SOUTHCO is likely to be of the order of 41%. In the revenue
requirement application for FY 2002-03, SOUTHCO has stated that for the FY 2001-02, they
have set a targeted system loss reduction of 5% which they now consider to be impossible
due to recession in industrial sector, lower consumption by HT & EHT categories and
growth of load in LT sector. For the FY 2002-03, they have proposed a target of reduction
of 2% to achieve a distribution system loss of 39% during the year. Accordingly, they have
requested OERC to accept the distribution loss of 39% for computing their revenue
requirement for the year 2002-03. |
3.15
|
Tariff Revision Proposal (Tariff schedule as per
existing and as proposed -Annex-D1 & Annex -D2 )
|
3.15.1
|
SOUTHCO has proposed an overall tariff rise of 37% to
compensate for the shortfall in revenue requirement for the year 2001-02. It has also
requested to carry forward a substantial portion of losses incurred by them for recovery
in future tariff.
|
3.15.2
|
SOUTHCO proposes to move towards a cost based tariff
structure for which a minimum increase of 30 paise per unit has been suggested in EHT/HT
category and a rise of 60-130 paise per unit has been proposed for different consumers in
LT category. No change has been proposed in tariff for Kutir Jyoti consumers. SOUTHCO also
has proposed modification to the monthly minimum fixed charges for LT categories of
consumers.
|
3.16
|
Cross-subsidy
|
3.16.1
|
SOUTHCO submits that if the Commission feels it necessary for
phasing out cross-subsidy at a faster pace, the Commission can consider the proposal for
State Government subsidy to compensate the utility for the financial implications of the
proposed measure as the State Government has a significant role to play in balancing the
varying interest of different classes of consumer. The request to OERC is to come out with
appropriate direction in this regard.
|
3.16.2
|
SOUTHCO has proposed no change in the special tariff for
consumers with load of 100 MVA and above and a guaranteed monthly load factor of 80%.
|
3.17
|
Prayer 2001-02 SOUTHCO has
requested for
-
Approval of the proposed retail tariff and charges
-
Confirmation of the revenue requirement
-
Confirmation of expected revenue from proposed tariff for SOUTHCO
|
3.18
|
Financial year 2002-03 The revenue
requirement and the expected revenue for the year 2002-03 as projected by SOUTHCO is given
in the table.
Table : 4
(Rs. in Crore)
Power Purchase Cost |
210.36 |
Distribution cost |
178.27 |
Previous losses |
301.97 |
Contribution to contingency reserve |
1.26 |
Total revenue requirement |
691.87 |
(-) Misc. Receipts |
3.55 |
Reasonable return |
|
Net revenue requirement |
688.32 |
Net revenue receipt from sale of power |
349.04 |
Deficit |
339.28 |
|
3.19
|
Prayer 2002-03 SOUTHCO has
requested for confirmation of revenue requirement for FY 2002-03.
-
Confirmation of revenue requirement for SOUTHCO
-
Permission for submission of an amended revenue requirement statement (if required)
along with a tariff revision proposal after the tariff order for BST and RST order for
2001-02 is released by OERC.
|
3.20
|
In its submission dated 30 March 2002 filed before the
Commission SOUTHCO has requested that the revenue requirement for the years 2001-02 and
2002-03 may be considered while fixing the tariff. In case, there is any gap left between
expected revenue and revenue requirement to avoid sharp increase in tariff, the unabsorbed
past loss may be adjusted in future years.
|